Newest sealed read: 2026-09-08. We re-read every source about every three months. We hold 1 sealed run going back to 2026-05-14.
What this page is14 rows held · newest sealed read 2026-09-08
- Every one of the 6 clauses on this page names who its own words reach and who they do not reach. The second half is the part most pages leave off.
- The 8 quoted passages below are the publisher's words, not a paraphrase, and each one links to the page it came from.
- 8 of those passages were checked back against the source on 2026-09-08; the rest say why they were not.
- No sentence on this page says what your organisation must do. It says what the rule says.
Real rows out of our sealed copies
These are the clauses themselves. The table under them is the exact words we quote, so you can read the rule rather than our summary of it.
| Rule and clause | What it asks for | Who its own words reach | Who they do not reach | From when |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colorado SB 24-205, repealed and reenacted by SB26-189 SB26-189 bill summary Read it at the source | The 2024 Colorado AI Act is not the rule to write a notice against | Nothing: the General Assembly's own summary of SB26-189 says the act repeals and reenacts the 2024 provisions with new requirements. | A notice written to the 2024 Colorado AI Act text is written to provisions that were repealed and reenacted. | signed 14 May 2026 |
| Colorado SB26-189, Automated Decision-Making Technology SB26-189 bill summary, consumer notice Read it at the source | Clear and conspicuous notice at the point of interaction with a covered ADMT | Deployers of an automated decision-making technology used to materially influence a consequential decision — education, employment, housing, financial or lending services, insurance, health care, or essential government services and public benefits. | It does not reach a technology that is not used to materially influence one of those listed consequential decisions, and specified entities are exempted to the extent they comply with other legal obligations. | see the date note on this row CITE-CHECK: the start date of the Colorado consumer-notice duty |
| Colorado SB26-189, Automated Decision-Making Technology SB26-189 bill summary, adverse outcome Read it at the source | Plain-language description within 30 days of an adverse consequential decision | Deployers, after a covered ADMT makes a consequential decision that results in an adverse outcome for the consumer. | It is not triggered by a decision with no adverse outcome, and the attorney general is directed to write rules clarifying these post-adverse-outcome disclosures by 1 January 2027. | rules due by 1 January 2027 |
| Colorado SB26-189, Automated Decision-Making Technology SB26-189 bill summary, developer documentation Read it at the source | Give the deployer technical documentation from 1 January 2027 | Developers of a covered ADMT: intended uses, categories of training data, known limitations, and instructions for appropriate use and human review, plus notice of material updates. | It is a developer-to-deployer document, not a consumer notice; a company that only deploys somebody else's technology is on the receiving end of it. | 1 January 2027 |
| Colorado SB26-189, Automated Decision-Making Technology SB26-189 bill summary, records Read it at the source | Keep compliance records for at least three years | Both developers and deployers of a covered ADMT. | It says nothing about what a consumer is shown; a notice does not answer a record-keeping duty. | see the date note on the notice row |
| Colorado SB26-189, Automated Decision-Making Technology SB26-189 bill summary, human review Read it at the source | Consumers may request meaningful human review and reconsideration | Consumers, after a covered ADMT makes a consequential decision resulting in an adverse outcome; they may also request the personal data used and correction of factually incorrect data. | It is a right the consumer exercises, not a line of notice text, so a notice pack can point at it but cannot satisfy it. | see the date note on the notice row |
| Quoted for | The exact words | Source | Checked? |
|---|---|---|---|
| what the 2024 Colorado AI Act was | “In 2024, the general assembly enacted Senate Bill 24-205, which created consumer protections in interactions with artificial intelligence systems.” | Colorado General Assembly — SB26-189, Automated Decision-Making Technology (bill summary as enacted) | checked against the source |
| what happened to the 2024 act | “The act repeals and reenacts those provisions with new requirements regarding the use of automated decision-making technology in consequential decisions.” | Colorado General Assembly — SB26-189, Automated Decision-Making Technology (bill summary as enacted) | checked against the source |
| the consumer notice at the point of interaction | “The act establishes consumer notice requirements, mandating that deployers provide clear and conspicuous notice to consumers at the point of interaction with a covered ADMT.” | Colorado General Assembly — SB26-189, Automated Decision-Making Technology (bill summary as enacted) | checked against the source |
| the developer documentation duty and its date | “starting January 1, 2027, to provide a deployer of a covered ADMT (deployer) with technical documentation describing the covered ADMT” | Colorado General Assembly — SB26-189, Automated Decision-Making Technology (bill summary as enacted) | checked against the source |
| the 30-day explanation after an adverse outcome | “within 30 days after the covered ADMT makes a consequential decision that results in an adverse outcome for the consumer” | Colorado General Assembly — SB26-189, Automated Decision-Making Technology (bill summary as enacted) | checked against the source |
| the record-keeping duty | “Both developers and deployers are required to retain records necessary to demonstrate compliance with the act for at least 3 years.” | Colorado General Assembly — SB26-189, Automated Decision-Making Technology (bill summary as enacted) | checked against the source |
| the consumer's right to human review | “The act also grants consumers the right to request meaningful human review and reconsideration following a covered ADMT making a consequential decision resulting in an adverse outcome.” | Colorado General Assembly — SB26-189, Automated Decision-Making Technology (bill summary as enacted) | checked against the source |
| who enforces it and how | “The attorney general is directed to enforce the act through the 'Colorado Consumer Protection Act', and a violation of the act is deemed a deceptive trade practice.” | Colorado General Assembly — SB26-189, Automated Decision-Making Technology (bill summary as enacted) | checked against the source |
What this page cannot tell you
- This is a reading of published rule text, not advice. Whether any of it reaches a particular company depends on facts this page does not have.
- Rules change and courts read them. The date beside each clause is the date the publisher names, not a promise about tomorrow.
- We could not verify: the start date of the Colorado consumer-notice duty.
- We re-read the sources about every 90 days. If more than 180 days have passed since the date at the top, treat this page as stale and open the source links yourself.
- Not affiliated with the European Commission, the California Legislative Counsel, the Colorado General Assembly, the Utah Legislature, the Maine Office of the Revisor of Statutes or the New York State Senate. Not legal, tax or professional advice. Rule text quoted from those publishers' own pages as of 2026-09-08.
See the file before you pay
You do not have to take our word for what is in the file. Here are 25 rows of the real thing, carrying all 9 of its columns, cut out of the dated copies we sealed ourselves. Nothing in it is made up and nothing in it is tidied up.
- Open the 25 rows as a CSVA plain spreadsheet file. It saves to your machine rather than painting itself into a browser tab, and it opens in Excel, Numbers or Google Sheets.
- The same 25 rows as JSONThe same rows again, laid out for reading with code.
What arrives after you pay: a private web page with every notice as plain text and as an HTML snippet, the dated matrix, the placement checklist and a downloadable bundle — within 15 minutes of payment. If it has not arrived, email operations@ustechautomations.com and a person sends it.
What you would be paying for: $49 once, for the AI disclosure notice pack. Nothing recurring, nothing to cancel and no subscription behind it. You get one private web page carrying each notice as copy-ready plain text and as a plain HTML snippet you paste into your own site, the dated matrix of every rule clause we hold with the publisher's exact words and a link to the page it came from, a checklist of where each notice goes and when it appears, the list of dates those rules name, and a JSON and text bundle you download and keep. You host the files; we host nothing for you. There is no badge, no public list of who bought it, no monitoring service and no promise to tell you when a rule changes. The rule text is quoted from the publishers' own pages and is dated: it is what those pages said on the day of the build, and the sources may lag. Four of the fifty-six quoted passages could not be re-checked from our machine and the pack names them. This is not legal, tax or professional advice, and nothing in it says whether your organisation complies with anything. Refund on request within 14 days. There is no pay button on this page yet. The private page is delivered within 15 minutes of payment. Still not here after 15 minutes? Reply to your Stripe receipt.
These 25 rows are a slice of the file, not the whole of it. What we cannot show you here is how far back it goes: that is the part you are paying for.
Buy the notice pack — $49
No pay button on this one yet. Email operations@ustechautomations.com. Ask what is in it before you pay. We reply with the current rule count, the list of what we could not verify, and the checkout link.
What you would be paying for: $49 once, for the AI disclosure notice pack. Nothing recurring, nothing to cancel and no subscription behind it. You get one private web page carrying each notice as copy-ready plain text and as a plain HTML snippet you paste into your own site, the dated matrix of every rule clause we hold with the publisher's exact words and a link to the page it came from, a checklist of where each notice goes and when it appears, the list of dates those rules name, and a JSON and text bundle you download and keep. You host the files; we host nothing for you. There is no badge, no public list of who bought it, no monitoring service and no promise to tell you when a rule changes. The rule text is quoted from the publishers' own pages and is dated: it is what those pages said on the day of the build, and the sources may lag. Four of the fifty-six quoted passages could not be re-checked from our machine and the pack names them. This is not legal, tax or professional advice, and nothing in it says whether your organisation complies with anything. Refund on request within 14 days. There is no pay button on this page yet. The private page is delivered within 15 minutes of payment. Still not here after 15 minutes? Reply to your Stripe receipt.
Email us for the $49 checkout linkNo pay button on this page yet. The rule text is the publishers' own; the notice drafts are ours and are not legal advice.
More from this feed
- Up one level: AI disclosure notice packThe whole feed, its price, and how the file arrives.
- What is and is not in this feedEvery source we read for it, how often, and the ones we refuse to collect.