Newest sealed read: 2026-09-08. We re-read every source about every three months. We hold 1 sealed run going back to 2026-05-14.
What this page is15 rows held · newest sealed read 2026-09-08
- 7 clauses across 2 places (Colorado, Illinois) drive this one notice, and they do not ask for the same thing.
- Each clause below states who its own words reach and who they do not reach.
- The draft text names the clauses it was written from, so you can read them rather than trust the wording.
- Quoted passages behind these clauses: 8. Sources read 2026-09-08.
Real rows out of our sealed copies
These clauses all point at the same notice, from different places, and they do not ask for identical things.
| Rule and clause | What it asks for | Who its own words reach | Who they do not reach | From when |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colorado SB 24-205, repealed and reenacted by SB26-189 SB26-189 bill summary Read it at the source | The 2024 Colorado AI Act is not the rule to write a notice against | Nothing: the General Assembly's own summary of SB26-189 says the act repeals and reenacts the 2024 provisions with new requirements. | A notice written to the 2024 Colorado AI Act text is written to provisions that were repealed and reenacted. | signed 14 May 2026 |
| Colorado SB26-189, Automated Decision-Making Technology SB26-189 bill summary, consumer notice Read it at the source | Clear and conspicuous notice at the point of interaction with a covered ADMT | Deployers of an automated decision-making technology used to materially influence a consequential decision — education, employment, housing, financial or lending services, insurance, health care, or essential government services and public benefits. | It does not reach a technology that is not used to materially influence one of those listed consequential decisions, and specified entities are exempted to the extent they comply with other legal obligations. | see the date note on this row CITE-CHECK: the start date of the Colorado consumer-notice duty |
| Colorado SB26-189, Automated Decision-Making Technology SB26-189 bill summary, adverse outcome Read it at the source | Plain-language description within 30 days of an adverse consequential decision | Deployers, after a covered ADMT makes a consequential decision that results in an adverse outcome for the consumer. | It is not triggered by a decision with no adverse outcome, and the attorney general is directed to write rules clarifying these post-adverse-outcome disclosures by 1 January 2027. | rules due by 1 January 2027 |
| Colorado SB26-189, Automated Decision-Making Technology SB26-189 bill summary, developer documentation Read it at the source | Give the deployer technical documentation from 1 January 2027 | Developers of a covered ADMT: intended uses, categories of training data, known limitations, and instructions for appropriate use and human review, plus notice of material updates. | It is a developer-to-deployer document, not a consumer notice; a company that only deploys somebody else's technology is on the receiving end of it. | 1 January 2027 |
| Colorado SB26-189, Automated Decision-Making Technology SB26-189 bill summary, records Read it at the source | Keep compliance records for at least three years | Both developers and deployers of a covered ADMT. | It says nothing about what a consumer is shown; a notice does not answer a record-keeping duty. | see the date note on the notice row |
| Colorado SB26-189, Automated Decision-Making Technology SB26-189 bill summary, human review Read it at the source | Consumers may request meaningful human review and reconsideration | Consumers, after a covered ADMT makes a consequential decision resulting in an adverse outcome; they may also request the personal data used and correction of factually incorrect data. | It is a right the consumer exercises, not a line of notice text, so a notice pack can point at it but cannot satisfy it. | see the date note on the notice row |
| Illinois Public Act 103-0804 (HB 3773) — text not held not fetched We hold no fetched text for this one. | AI in employment decisions — we hold no text for this one | We do not state who it covers. ilga.gov refuses this host: the certificate chain does not verify, and skipping verification answers 403. The browser route fails on the same certificate. We publish no quote and no date we could not read. | What we can say from the other sources on this page is that this act is written about employment decisions rather than chatbot disclosure, so a chat banner is not the thing it asks for. | not stated — source unfetchable CITE-CHECK: the whole of Illinois Public Act 103-0804 (HB 3773) |
| Part | Text |
|---|---|
| Watermark | DRAFT — buy to remove |
| The notice | [your organisation] uses automated decision-making technology at this step. It processes your personal data to help decide the outcome. You can ask what it did, ask for the data it used, ask for factually incorrect data to be corrected, and ask for a human to review the decision. |
| Watermark | DRAFT — buy to remove |
| Where it goes | At the point of interaction with the automated system, before the decision step, and in the record sent afterwards. |
| Written from | co-notice, co-adverse, co-review |
What this page cannot tell you
- A notice is not the only thing some of these clauses ask for. Several ask for a protocol, a tool or a record, and no wording answers those.
- The draft is a draft. This page does not say it is enough for any particular company, because that depends on facts it does not have.
- We re-read the sources about every 90 days; past 180 days treat the page as stale.
- We could not verify: the start date of the Colorado consumer-notice duty; the whole of Illinois Public Act 103-0804 (HB 3773).
- Not affiliated with the European Commission, the California Legislative Counsel, the Colorado General Assembly, the Utah Legislature, the Maine Office of the Revisor of Statutes or the New York State Senate. Not legal, tax or professional advice. Rule text quoted from those publishers' own pages as of 2026-09-08.
See the file before you pay
You do not have to take our word for what is in the file. Here are 25 rows of the real thing, carrying all 9 of its columns, cut out of the dated copies we sealed ourselves. Nothing in it is made up and nothing in it is tidied up.
- Open the 25 rows as a CSVA plain spreadsheet file. It saves to your machine rather than painting itself into a browser tab, and it opens in Excel, Numbers or Google Sheets.
- The same 25 rows as JSONThe same rows again, laid out for reading with code.
What arrives after you pay: a private web page with every notice as plain text and as an HTML snippet, the dated matrix, the placement checklist and a downloadable bundle — within 15 minutes of payment. If it has not arrived, email operations@ustechautomations.com and a person sends it.
What you would be paying for: $49 once, for the AI disclosure notice pack. Nothing recurring, nothing to cancel and no subscription behind it. You get one private web page carrying each notice as copy-ready plain text and as a plain HTML snippet you paste into your own site, the dated matrix of every rule clause we hold with the publisher's exact words and a link to the page it came from, a checklist of where each notice goes and when it appears, the list of dates those rules name, and a JSON and text bundle you download and keep. You host the files; we host nothing for you. There is no badge, no public list of who bought it, no monitoring service and no promise to tell you when a rule changes. The rule text is quoted from the publishers' own pages and is dated: it is what those pages said on the day of the build, and the sources may lag. Four of the fifty-six quoted passages could not be re-checked from our machine and the pack names them. This is not legal, tax or professional advice, and nothing in it says whether your organisation complies with anything. Refund on request within 14 days. There is no pay button on this page yet. The private page is delivered within 15 minutes of payment. Still not here after 15 minutes? Reply to your Stripe receipt.
These 25 rows are a slice of the file, not the whole of it. What we cannot show you here is how far back it goes: that is the part you are paying for.
Buy the notice pack — $49
No pay button on this one yet. Email operations@ustechautomations.com. Ask what is in it before you pay. We reply with the current rule count, the list of what we could not verify, and the checkout link.
What you would be paying for: $49 once, for the AI disclosure notice pack. Nothing recurring, nothing to cancel and no subscription behind it. You get one private web page carrying each notice as copy-ready plain text and as a plain HTML snippet you paste into your own site, the dated matrix of every rule clause we hold with the publisher's exact words and a link to the page it came from, a checklist of where each notice goes and when it appears, the list of dates those rules name, and a JSON and text bundle you download and keep. You host the files; we host nothing for you. There is no badge, no public list of who bought it, no monitoring service and no promise to tell you when a rule changes. The rule text is quoted from the publishers' own pages and is dated: it is what those pages said on the day of the build, and the sources may lag. Four of the fifty-six quoted passages could not be re-checked from our machine and the pack names them. This is not legal, tax or professional advice, and nothing in it says whether your organisation complies with anything. Refund on request within 14 days. There is no pay button on this page yet. The private page is delivered within 15 minutes of payment. Still not here after 15 minutes? Reply to your Stripe receipt.
Email us for the $49 checkout linkNo pay button on this page yet. The rule text is the publishers' own; the notice drafts are ours and are not legal advice.
More from this feed
- Up one level: AI disclosure notice packThe whole feed, its price, and how the file arrives.
- What is and is not in this feedEvery source we read for it, how often, and the ones we refuse to collect.