Phoenix-Metro Permit Fee Report
Specification as of 2026-08-08: you send 3 inputs, you get back 5 sections.
Phoenix-metro cities publish permit fees in different places: an adopted fee schedule, a code section, or a plan review desk that quotes at intake. This report covers one permit type across up to 12 jurisdictions and puts the official source URL, retrieval time, and quoted excerpt behind every fee line.
$249
one-time
Request this →Checkout for this service opens by emailed invoice link. Tell us where to send it and we reply the same working day.
What you get
- One permit type across up to 12 Phoenix-metro jurisdictions, one row each
- PDF for the estimate file plus CSV built from the same rows
- Source URL, retrieval time, and excerpt on every fee line
- Delivered within 2 business days of usable inputs
Who this is for
You are a permit coordinator or estimator at a solar, HVAC, or electrical contractor bidding across Phoenix-metro city lines. Some cities publish a permit fee schedule you can cite. Others point to a code section or quote at plan review, so your estimate carries a number nobody can trace.
This report gives the trail instead of the guess. Where the public record does not support a fee, the row reads unknown or set at plan review. If the records cannot support your permit type, you hear that before any payment.
Free specimen and paid-delivery boundary
Paid delivery contract
You send:
- The permit type as it appears on the bid, for example residential rooftop solar under 20 kW
- A short project-use description: residential or commercial, scope, and occupancy
- Any jurisdictions to prioritize; without a list we work the twelve covered cities in alphabetical order
You get back:
- PDF, one section per jurisdiction: fee line, calculation basis, and the excerpt it came from
- CSV columns for jurisdiction, fee or status, basis, source URL, retrieval time, and excerpt
- A status on every row: published, unknown, or set at plan review
- Formulas printed as formulas when a city fees by valuation or kW, not reduced to a guess
- A closing note naming what could not be sourced and the city department that holds it
The sample here is this specification, not a filled-in report. A demo would have to print fees for named cities, and any number invented to fill it would be a claim about a jurisdiction we never retrieved. The specification states the columns, the statuses, and the provenance rule, so you can judge the artifact before paying.
Jurisdictions are worked one at a time against what the city itself publishes: the adopted fee schedule, the code section that sets it, or the written plan review policy that defers it. A fee is printed only when the retrieved excerpt contains it, and every row carries the URL and the retrieval time so a reviewer can reopen the page. Councils change fees, so each row is dated. This is research on public records, not legal, engineering, or permitting advice, and it is not affiliated with any city or agency.
View the full machine-readable specimen and evidence rows
US Tech Automations is a data and automation company. These are our own service terms, not a government fee, filing cost, or permit charge. Nothing on this page is legal, engineering, or financial advice.