Skip to content
AI & Automation

Apartment Leasing Commission Tracking Software 2027: 3 Steps

Oct 19, 2026

Short answer: a leasing-agent report, not a separate product

Apartment leasing commission tracking software records which leasing agent earned credit on each executed lease, applies the split you set, and lists what you owe at month end.

For a small operator, commission tracking usually shows up as a report inside a property management system or as a ledger you maintain yourself, not as a separate product category. Of the six products we checked, Buildium is the only one whose pages describe a leasing-agent role and a report that groups activated leases by agent, and that description comes from a 2016 announcement you should confirm in the current product before you buy.

TL;DR: If you already run Buildium, ask for its leasing-agent report in writing. If you do not, a written rule plus a ledger fed by a system export is the realistic baseline, and the quote-based vendors should be treated as questions rather than budgets.

Key Takeaways

  • None of the pages we opened describes a dedicated apartment leasing commission module. Commission tracking appears as a report, a user role, or a spreadsheet task.

  • Buildium is the only vendor whose pages describe a leasing-agent role and a leasing agent report. That description is from a 2016 announcement, so confirm it still matches the product.

  • Published starting prices differ by pricing model, and a monthly minimum can override a low per-unit rate for a small portfolio.

  • Rent Manager and Rentvine are quote-based on the pages we opened, so their figures belong in a written quote, not in a budget.

  • Zapier plus a Google Sheets ledger is the realistic do-it-yourself baseline, and you own the error handling either way.

Who this is for

This guide is for the owner or operations lead at a small property management business who is close to choosing a system and needs to know whether commission tracking comes with it. You pay leasing agents for executed leases, so you need to know who earned each commission and what to pay. If you are still deciding how leasing follow-up should work, our CRM comparison for leasing teams covers that broader question.

Red flags: no written commission rule, no agent recorded on draft leases, or no export or API route out of the system you already use.

How we evaluated these tools

We kept six products that sell residential property management and that we could check through the vendor's own site or a named third-party page. Buildium, AppFolio, DoorLoop, Rent Manager and Rentvine were checked on their own pricing pages. Yardi's own pages returned a 403 error to our check, so the Yardi Breeze figures come from CostBench, an independent pricing site, and are labeled that way. We left out Entrata because its pricing page returned a not-found error, and we left out Compass and CommercialEdge because one commission page returned not-found and the other redirected to a general site.

The weights below are our judgment about what matters for this decision. They are not market data. Commission capability carries the most weight because the question is commission tracking, not general property management.

CriterionWeightScore scaleWhy it matters
Documented leasing-agent commission capability30%1 to 5Commission tracking is the job, so a vendor page should show it
Agent-level reporting of executed leases20%1 to 5Payouts depend on activation dates and agent tags
Published pricing and minimums15%1 to 5Small portfolios hit monthly floors quickly
Cost at a 50-unit portfolio15%1 to 5Per-unit rates and flat minimums produce very different totals
Export or API access10%1 to 5You need data to move into a ledger or workflow
Evidence quality10%1 to 5Vendor pages rank above third-party listings

A note on independence: the National Apartment Association research we opened was sponsored by AppFolio, so we did not use it to score AppFolio. The NAA's AI research drew nearly 1,000 survey responses after interviews with 12 industry leaders, according to NAA (2024), and the page we opened does not address leasing commissions.

Feature matrix: what the pages we opened document

"Not documented" means the pages we opened did not mention the feature. It does not mean the product lacks it. "Not verified" means we could not open the vendor's own page for that question. Every gap is a question to put to the vendor in writing.

ProductLeasing-agent roleAgent-level lease reportSplit or tier rulesOpen APIPricing basis
BuildiumYes, per 2016 announcementYes, per 2016 announcementNot documentedStated for PremiumStarting prices published
AppFolioNot documentedNot documentedNot documentedNot verifiedStarting per-unit prices; final cost quote-based
DoorLoopNot documentedNot documentedNot documentedNot verifiedPer-unit rates with monthly minimums
Yardi BreezeNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedMinimums via CostBench; Yardi page not reachable
Rent ManagerNot documentedNot documentedNot documentedNot verifiedQuote-based
RentvineNot documentedNot documentedNot documentedNot verifiedQuote-based; headline rate only

Rentvine's pages describe automated management fees that post and reconcile across portfolios. That is fee posting, not agent commissions. Rent Manager's pricing page names Basic, Plus and Premium plans and does not mention agent reporting.

What the vendors charge, and what 50 units would cost

Pricing checked October 18, 2026. Published prices come in three shapes: flat monthly tiers, per-unit rates with minimums, and quote-based pricing where the page gives only a headline. The table converts each published basis to a monthly figure for a 50-unit portfolio so you can see where minimums override the per-unit math. That is arithmetic on public rates, not a quote.

VendorPlanPublished starting priceUnit basis and minimumCost at 50 unitsSource
BuildiumEssential$62 per monthFlat monthly; no unit limit listed$62 at the starting priceBuildium pricing
BuildiumGrowth$192 per monthFlat monthly; no unit limit listed$192 at the starting priceBuildium pricing
BuildiumPremium$400 per monthFlat monthly; no unit limit listed$400 at the starting priceBuildium pricing
AppFolioCore$1.49 per unit per month50-unit minimum and a minimum spend$74.50 before minimum spendAppFolio pricing
AppFolioPlus$3.20 per unit per monthMinimum spend and unit requirements$160 before minimum spendAppFolio pricing
DoorLoopOne$2.50 per unit per month$199 monthly minimum$199, minimum appliesDoorLoop pricing
DoorLoopConnect$4.00 per unit per month$299 monthly minimum$299, minimum appliesDoorLoop pricing
DoorLoopMultiply$5.00 per unit per month$399 monthly minimum$399, minimum appliesDoorLoop pricing
Yardi BreezeResidential$1 per unit per month$100 monthly minimum$100, minimum appliesCostBench Yardi page
RentvinePer active unitAs low as $1.50 per unitFinal cost quote-based$75 at the headline rateRentvine pricing
Rent ManagerBasic, Plus, PremiumQuote-basedQuote-basedQuote-basedRent Manager pricing

Core starting price: $1.49 per unit per month according to AppFolio (current page). AppFolio's Core plan carries a 50-unit minimum and a minimum spend, so the $74.50 in the table is a floor before that spend.

The minimums matter more than the rates. At 50 units, DoorLoop's One, Connect and Multiply plans and Yardi Breeze's residential plan all show a monthly minimum that overrides the per-unit math, so the floor is what you would pay.

PlanPer-unit math at 50 unitsMonthly minimumMonthly floor you would pay
DoorLoop One$125$199$199
DoorLoop Connect$200$299$299
DoorLoop Multiply$250$399$399
Yardi Breeze Residential$50$100$100

Third-party pages are less reliable than the vendor sites here. A CostBench page gives a Buildium top-plan range that disagrees with Buildium's own top-plan price, and a review site still lists DoorLoop plan names that no longer match DoorLoop's pricing page. Use the vendor page as the baseline and treat aggregator figures as leads.

Vendor profiles: best fit, limits, implementation and evidence

Buildium

Best fit: an operator who already runs Buildium, or who wants a system that tags a leasing agent on every draft lease. Essential plan starting price: $62 per month according to Buildium (2026). Its pricing page states that Premium includes Open API, and it does not clearly say whether Essential or Growth do.

The leasing-agent report lists activated leases by property and agent, with rent amount and activation date, according to Buildium (2016). The announcement says the eSignature date appears only if you use eLeasing, and the report covers only leases converted from draft to active. Leasing Agent users cannot access financial reporting or accounting, so they cannot check their own payouts inside the product.

Limits: the report supplies the inputs for a payout, not the payout itself. Split tiers and clawbacks are not documented on the pages we opened. Add-on fees such as eSignature and tenant screening are billed per use, so add them to the total.

Implementation: in the 2016 announcement, you assign the Leasing Agent role under Settings > Users, tag the agent on each draft lease, and run the leasing agent report at month end. Those paths date from 2016 and we did not open the current help center, so confirm them there before you rely on them.

AppFolio

Best fit: an operator who wants a larger platform and is willing to take a quote for final pricing. The pricing page lists starting per-unit prices across Core, Plus and Max, and says final costs are quote-based. Max lists Leasing CRM and Leasing Signals, but neither is described as commission tracking.

Limits: the pages we opened do not mention commission or leasing-agent payout tracking. AppFolio also sponsored the NAA research cited above, so we did not use that research to rate it.

Implementation: before you sign, ask for an agent-level report on one sample property, in writing. If that report is missing, plan for a ledger alongside the system.

DoorLoop

Best fit: an operator who wants transparent per-unit pricing with a monthly minimum and does not need commission reporting yet. DoorLoop's One plan costs $2.50 per unit per month with a $199 monthly minimum according to DoorLoop (current page). The page also lists Connect and Multiply tiers with higher per-unit rates and minimums.

Limits: the pricing page describes DoorLoop AI as an add-on without a published price, and it does not mention commissions or leasing-agent reports. Third-party listings show older plan names, so do not budget from them.

Implementation: ask whether lease and agent data can be exported, and in what format, before you commit.

Yardi Breeze

Best fit: an operator who is evaluating a Yardi product and is willing to confirm the minimum with sales. Yardi's Breeze residential plan costs $100 a month as a minimum, at $1 per unit, according to CostBench (2026). CostBench says it last verified that page on July 14, 2026.

Limits: Yardi's own pricing page returned a 403 error to our check, so we could not confirm these figures on Yardi's site. CostBench says annual prices are not published and that anything beyond the listed minimums requires contacting sales. We did not find a documented commission feature.

Implementation: get the minimum and any commission report demonstration in writing before the sales call ends.

Rent Manager

Best fit: an operator who prefers a vendor-led package and is comfortable receiving custom quotes. The pricing page names Basic, Plus and Premium plans and gives no dollar figures.

Limits: the page does not mention commission or agent reporting, so every price and capability is a question for the sales team.

Implementation: request a written sample of an agent-level lease report. Lead follow-up is a separate job, and for that side of leasing see email and SMS tools for leasing teams.

Rentvine

Best fit: an operator who manages owners' funds and wants management fees posted and reconciled automatically. Rentvine's pricing page says "as low as $1.50 per unit" and that pricing is charged per active unit, but final cost is quote-based, according to Rentvine (current page).

Limits: its automated management fees feature posts and reconciles fees, not agent commissions. The page says transaction and screening fees may apply, without giving amounts.

Implementation: ask for a worked leasing-agent commission example, and expect to receive a quote rather than a list price.

Build it yourself: Google Sheets and Zapier as the baseline

For many small teams the realistic alternative is a ledger in Google Sheets, with Zapier connecting it to a system export. Zapier's Free plan covers 100 tasks a month, and its Pro plan costs $29.99 per month on monthly billing for 750 tasks, according to Zapier (current page).

Zap run data: 60 days guaranteed according to Zapier (current help article). The same article says the Zap history page displays up to 10,000 runs, so export your history if you need a permanent record. Zapier's pricing page lists audit logs on Team and Enterprise and autoreplay and error settings on paid plans, which are real controls that you must configure.

Worked example, illustrative only, using numbers chosen for the arithmetic: imagine a three-agent team that activates 14 leases in one month at an average rent of $1,850, paying 25% of the first month's rent, which is a rule you set and not a market rate. The commission payable is 14 × $1,850 × 25%, or $6,475. Keying each rent figure by hand at 5 minutes per lease adds 70 minutes of checking each month, and a rent figure keyed $100 low cuts that lease's payout by $25. A Sheets ledger that appends one row per activated lease through spreadsheets.values.append, the Google Sheets method for appending rows, removes most of the retyping, but it does not make the decisions for you. Someone must decide what happens when the same activation fires twice, how a cancelled lease is reversed, and who may edit the rate column.

Zapier and a ledger are a fair baseline, and they can support run history, replays and error settings when you configure them. You still own duplicate protection, escalation to a person, access controls and maintenance when a field in your system changes. Those are design decisions the buyer makes, whatever tool runs them. For a related look at commission workflows, see BrokerSumo vs Loft47 commission management.

Where a managed workflow fits

US Tech Automations builds and runs automation as a managed service rather than a self-serve tool, and its site describes the offering as "automation as a managed outcome, not a DIY tool." Its site lists Gmail, Google Calendar, Google Sheets, HubSpot, QuickBooks and Stripe among its integrations, with "and more" after them.

Proposed, configurable design, not a live deployment: the first trigger is a draft lease that changes to active in your property system. The workflow reads the property, agent, rent amount and activation date from an export or API call, applies the commission rule you wrote down, and writes a pending row to a ledger in Google Sheets or QuickBooks. A leasing manager approves each pending row before any payout, and rows with a missing agent tag or rent figure go to an exceptions list. The prerequisites are an export or API route from your system, an agent tag on every draft lease, and a written rule.

A second proposed trigger is a cancellation before move-in. The workflow would flag the matching pending row for reversal and notify the manager by email, but a person decides whether any money moves, and the workflow would not change an amount already paid. Both paths need a named approver, an exceptions list and a log of every change.

Compared with Zapier and a ledger, a US Tech Automations design could configure the approval pattern its published sample support workflow uses, where a person approves, edits or rejects each draft before it goes out, alongside the exceptions list and change log. The buyer would still own the commission rules, the list of who can approve, and any later change to the design. That design also depends on the export or API access described above.

When NOT to use US Tech Automations: skip a managed build if Buildium's leasing-agent report already gives you the inputs and one person can approve each payout in a few minutes. Skip it if you close only a handful of leases a month, because a spreadsheet with a written rule is simpler. Skip it too if your system cannot export lease activations and you will not change it, since the workflow would have no trigger to start from.

3 steps to choose and set up tracking

  1. Write the rule before you shop. Put the commission rate, the base (for example, the first month's rent), the trigger (activation or move-in), the clawback window and the approver on one page.

  2. Ask each vendor for the report in writing. Request an agent-level report of executed leases for one sample property, showing agent, activation date and rent amount. Ask whether split tiers and clawbacks are supported, and get the price in writing from every quote-based vendor.

  3. Run one month in parallel. Pay from the new report or ledger only after it matches the method you already use. Log every mismatch and fix the rule or the agent tag before you switch.

Decision checklist

  • The commission rule fits in one written paragraph
  • Every draft lease has a named leasing agent
  • An agent-level lease report has been shown in writing
  • Export or API access is confirmed for the plan you would buy
  • Every quote-based vendor has given a final price in writing
  • A named person approves each payout
  • The clawback or cancellation process is written down

Who should choose each option

OptionChoose it ifAvoid it if
BuildiumYou already use it, or you want a built-in leasing-agent report you can verifyYou need documented split tiers or clawbacks today
AppFolioYou want a larger platform and will take a quoteYou need a published final price before the sales call
DoorLoopYou want transparent per-unit pricing with a minimumYou need commission reporting in writing
Yardi BreezeYou are evaluating a Yardi product and will confirm the minimum with salesYou need Yardi's own published prices to compare
Rent ManagerYou want a custom quote and a vendor-led packageYou need prices before a sales call
RentvineYou manage owners' funds and need fee postingYou need agent-level leasing commissions
Google Sheets plus ZapierYou can write the rule down and will own error handlingYou cannot keep a manual review step

Questions buyers ask

Does Buildium track leasing agent commissions?

Buildium's 2016 announcement describes a Leasing Agent role and a report of activated leases by property and agent, which you can use to calculate and pay commissions. We could not confirm that the current product still works that way, so ask for a current screenshot of the report before you buy.

Is there a standalone apartment commission product?

Not one we could verify, with both public pricing and a documented residential leasing commission feature. The commission-specialist pages we tried either returned a not-found error or redirected to a general site.

Which option has the lowest published starting price?

Buildium's Essential plan has the lowest published starting price in the table, but its page does not list unit limits, so confirm the cost at your own unit count. The 50-unit column shows how each minimum changes the total.

Can Zapier replace a commission tool?

It can run a simple rule-based ledger, but you own duplicate protection, escalation and access controls. Zapier's run history is not a permanent record, so export it on a regular schedule.

Where does US Tech Automations fit?

It fits as a managed build-and-run service for a workflow you design and approve, after your rules and exports are clear. It is not a replacement for a property management system, and the review points described above stay with you.

Why is Entrata not in the table?

Its pricing page returned a not-found error when we checked, so we could not verify its prices or whether it documents commission features.

Conclusion

Start with what your current system can already answer. If it tags leasing agents on draft leases and reports activated leases by agent, use that report and a written rule before you shop. If it cannot, build a ledger from a system export first, and compare managed options only after the rules and exports are clear. see how US Tech Automations configures this

About the Author

Garrett Mullins
Garrett Mullins
Workflow Specialist

Helping businesses leverage automation for operational efficiency.