Skip to content
AI & Automation

Best Fuel Management Software: 3 Steps to Pick in 2027

Nov 5, 2026

Start with the category, not the brand

Fuel management software matches each fuel purchase to a vehicle, a driver, a mileage record and a state, so you can catch card misuse and prepare fuel taxes from one set of records. The tools in this guide fall into three categories: card-linked telematics, maintenance platforms that log fuel, and fuel cards with reporting attached.

If your fleet already buys fuel on a card and files IFTA, start with a telematics platform that can link card transactions to GPS miles by state. Samsara and Motive describe that link most directly on their own pages, and neither publishes prices, so you will need a quote. Azuga and Fleetio publish per-vehicle prices, but the pages we opened do not describe IFTA filing for them. WEX and AtoB are card decisions first, and the card's fee schedule will move your cost more than the software line does.

TL;DR: choose the category, shortlist two products from it, get a quote and a sample export from each, and pick the one whose export needs the least hand-editing.

Key Takeaways

  • Choose the category first: card-linked telematics (Samsara, Motive, Verizon Connect, Azuga), maintenance-led (Fleetio), or card-led (AtoB, WEX).

  • Only Azuga and Fleetio publish per-vehicle prices on the pages we opened. The other five are quote-based.

  • Fuel-card integration and IFTA are separate questions. Motive says it automates IFTA reports but not the filing.

  • Ask for a sample export of fuel transactions and mileage by state before you sign, because that file decides how much hand work remains.

  • Budget against diesel spend, not the seat price. In the worked example below, a $30 per-vehicle plan for 10 trucks is under one percent of the month's fuel bill.

How we evaluated these tools

We did not run any of these products. This is a buyer's guide built from vendor pages and independent sources we opened on October 29, 2026. The table below shows the five criteria we weighted, the pass mark we used to decide whether a product was worth shortlisting, and why each one matters. The weights are an editorial framework, not a measured score.

CriterionWeightPass markWhy it matters
Fuel-card feed25%3 of 5Without a card feed, someone re-keys receipts, and the errors surface at IFTA time.
IFTA and jurisdiction output25%3 of 5Gallons and miles must be split by state every quarter, so the vendor has to show the report, not just claim it.
Price transparency15%3 of 5A vendor that publishes nothing forces a sales call before you can compare anything.
Export or API access15%3 of 5You need to move data into bookkeeping or a workflow tool, and you may want to leave later.
Fit for a small fleet20%3 of 5Minimum commitments, onboarding effort and contract length matter more when you run a few trucks.

Fuel-card feed and IFTA output carry half the weight because those two decide whether you re-key data every quarter. Export access and small-fleet fit carry the next 35 percent, since they decide how easily you can leave and whether the commitment fits a small operation. Price transparency is the remaining 15 percent.

Who this is for

This guide is for the owner or operations lead of a small logistics business who is close to choosing a tool and wants a direct comparison. It assumes your trucks buy fuel with a card or app and that you must report fuel by state.

Red flags: you buy fuel only with cash and never need to match receipts to trucks; your trucks never cross state lines, so IFTA does not apply; or a leasing company handles fuel and tax for every unit you run.

Where the cost and the paperwork sit

The software line is small next to fuel, so the cost question is really about how much manual work each product leaves you. The American Transportation Research Institute's cost study shows the operating cost per mile is rising, which makes fuel records and fuel-tax accuracy a bigger share of your margin. ATRI 2025 operating cost: $2.336 per mile according to Transport Topics (2025 data). Non-fuel costs in the same report were $1.854 per mile, so subtracting gives about $0.48 per mile for fuel. ATRI's summary does not state a fuel share, so treat that split as our arithmetic.

BenchmarkFigurePeriodSource
ATRI total cost to operate a truck$2.336 per mile2025Transport Topics
ATRI non-fuel cost$1.854 per mile2025Transport Topics
Fuel, by subtraction (our arithmetic)about $0.48 per mile2025Transport Topics
U.S. on-highway diesel, weekly$6.352 per gallonWeek of October 26, 2026U.S. Energy Information Administration
Florida IFTA Q1 return due dateApril 30Q1 (Jan–Mar)Florida DMV

The IFTA calendar adds a fixed quarterly deadline. Florida's IFTA page lists the January through March return as due April 30, April through June as due July 31, July through September as due October 31, and October through December as due January 31, according to Florida DMV. When a due date falls on a weekend or state holiday, the next business day becomes the deadline on that page.

US Tech Automations could be configured to run a quarter-end check before each of those dates. The trigger is a date the owner sets ahead of the due date. The action pulls the card's fuel-transaction export and the telematics mileage-by-jurisdiction report for the quarter, then compares gallons and miles by state. The output is a draft summary that flags each state where the two sources disagree, sent to the person who files the return. Prerequisites are an export or API from the card provider and from the telematics platform, a shared vehicle ID in both, and a named filer. The review points stay human: the filer confirms every jurisdiction and submits the return and payment in the state's own system.

Vendor profiles, with the limits stated

Each profile gives the best fit, the limitations, the implementation step that matters most, and the primary page we opened. Figures appear only where the vendor's own page states them.

Samsara

Best fit: operators who want fuel data inside a broader telematics system and can accept a quote-based contract. Samsara's fuel page says you can connect any fuel card "with open APIs or pre-built integrations in the Samsara App Marketplace," describes automated reporting to support IFTA filings, and offers configurable alerts for "any sudden fuel level drop of 10% or more."

Limitations: the page publishes no dollar amounts. Its pricing links say "Check our prices" and "Talk to sales." Implementation: confirm the App Marketplace integration for your specific card, and ask for a sample IFTA report built from your own trucks. Choose it if you want card data, mileage and fuel-theft alerts from one vendor and you accept a sales-led quote. Primary page: Samsara's fuel management page.

Motive

Best fit: fleets that want the card, GPS mileage and the IFTA report in one system. Motive's IFTA page says card transactions sync and are allocated to the correct jurisdictions, and its Vehicle Gateway tracks distance in each jurisdiction daily from GPS and odometer data.

Limitations: Motive's FAQ says it "doesn't automate IFTA fuel tax filing, but it does automate the creation of IFTA reports." Fuel bought outside the Motive Card needs a CSV import or a receipt upload. The IFTA page publishes no prices and its calls to action are "Get started," "Watch demo" and "Contact sales." Implementation: confirm the card, Vehicle Gateway and Driver App requirements, and test a CSV import for fuel bought outside the card. Choose it if you want one vendor for card, mileage and report, and you will file the return yourself. Primary page: Motive's IFTA product page.

Verizon Connect

Best fit: larger fleets already on Verizon Connect telematics that use one of its named card partners. Its fuel page says the software can "integrate with most trucking fuel card systems," names AmeriFuel, Comdata, FLEETCOR and Fuelman as integrations, and flags purchases that exceed a vehicle's tank capacity.

Limitations: the page says fuel tax filing "like IFTA" gets easier when GPS tracking is included. That is softer than a finished report. The page describes no API for fuel data, and no prices are published; the "See plans & pricing" button leads to sales. Implementation: confirm your card provider is among its partners and ask for a sample fuel report by state. Choose it if fraud alerts on purchases matter to you and you already use one of its partner cards. Primary page: Verizon Connect's fleet fuel management page.

Azuga

Best fit: small and mid-size fleets that want published per-vehicle prices and a fuel-card integration without a sales call first. The SafeFleet and CompleteFleet tiers include Fuel Card Integration, which the page says will "track your fleet's fuel expenses automatically."

Limitations: the pricing page does not mention IFTA on any plan, so ask for it in writing before you assume it. Implementation: ask which card providers the integration covers and whether IFTA output exists for each state you drive in. Choose it if the card feed is your main need and published pricing matters to your decision. Primary page: Azuga's pricing page.

Fleetio

Best fit: fleets that want maintenance records, asset data and fuel logs in one tool, and who have someone able to work with an API. The published tiers are in the pricing section below.

Limitations: the pricing page does not clearly assign fuel tracking to specific tiers, and its fuel-card entry points to a directory of card providers rather than a stated IFTA report. Fleetio is maintenance-first, so treat IFTA as a question for the sales call, not a feature to assume. Implementation: the developer guide documents /api/v1/fuel_entries for listing entries, and it notes a vendor reference only "if a vendor_id is saved on that Fuel Entry." Plan a reconciliation step for entries without one. Choose it if maintenance and fuel records belong in the same system. Primary pages: Fleetio's pricing page and Fleetio's fuel-entries guide.

AtoB

Best fit: fleets that want the card first and are willing to get every fee in writing. AtoB's pricing page shows no plan or fee figures. It does state that its credit limit is set from "weekly fuel spend."

Limitations: AtoB's pricing page claims "average discounts of 45¢ and up to $2.00 off per gallon" according to AtoB (current page). That is a discount claim, not a fee, and it does not show what you would pay. We did not verify AtoB's IFTA or telematics features on the pages we opened. Implementation: request a written fee schedule and confirm the transaction file format before you commit. Choose it if you want a card decision first and will confirm the integration path separately. Primary page: AtoB's pricing page.

WEX

Best fit: fleets that want a large acceptance network and rebates on the card. WEX's fleet card page says a card earns "3¢ to 15¢ per gallon" inside its nationwide savings network and "1¢ to 3¢ per gallon" outside it, according to WEX (current page). WEX network rebate ceiling: 15¢ per gallon according to WEX (current page).

Limitations: the maximum rebate requires fueling at a qualifying location, and the page excludes Tier 1 truck stop locations and big-box retail stores from rebates. The page we opened lists no complete fee schedule and describes no IFTA or telematics output. Implementation: ask for a written fee schedule that covers card, transaction and late-payment charges, and ask which telematics or IFTA tools accept the card feed. Choose it if rebates on your fueling pattern matter more to you than IFTA output from the same vendor. Primary page: WEX's fleet card page.

Normalized feature matrix

The matrix records only what the pages we opened state. A "Not verified" cell means we did not find the feature on the pages we read, not that the vendor lacks it.

VendorFuel-card feedIFTA outputPublished pricePages opened
SamsaraYes, via App Marketplace or open APIsYes, reports to support IFTA filingsNoSamsara fuel page
MotiveYes, Motive Card transactions syncYes, reports generated; filing not automatedNoMotive IFTA page
Verizon ConnectYes, named card partnersPartly; described as easier with GPSNoVerizon Connect fuel page
AzugaYes, on SafeFleet and CompleteFleetNot verifiedYes, per vehicleAzuga pricing page
FleetioDirectory of card providersNot verifiedYes, per vehicleFleetio pricing and developer guide
AtoBThe card itselfNot verifiedNo figuresAtoB pricing page
WEXThe card itselfNot verifiedQuote-basedWEX fleet card page

IFTA output is the tie-breaker for most small fleets, and only Samsara and Motive describe it on their own product pages. Treat every "Not verified" cell as a question for the sales call, and ask for the answer in writing.

Pricing: what is published and what is quote-based

Pricing checked October 29, 2026.

The BasicFleet plan on Azuga costs $25 per vehicle per month, the SafeFleet plan costs $30 and the CompleteFleet plan costs $35, according to Azuga (current page). Lowest published per-vehicle price we found: $4 monthly billed annually according to Fleetio (current page), with the Essential plan on Fleetio at $5 billed monthly, Professional at $7 and Premium at $10, both billed annually only.

VendorPlanPublished priceBilling basisStatus
AzugaBasicFleet$25 per vehicle per monthPer vehicle, monthly; fuel card integration not listedPublished
AzugaSafeFleet$30 per vehicle per monthIncludes fuel card integrationPublished
AzugaCompleteFleet$35 per vehicle per monthIncludes fuel card integrationPublished
FleetioEssential$4 per vehicle per monthBilled annually; $5 billed monthlyPublished
FleetioProfessional$7 per vehicle per monthBilled annually onlyPublished
FleetioPremium$10 per vehicle per monthBilled annually onlyPublished
SamsaraFuel managementQuote-basedQuote-basedNot published
MotiveIFTA reporting with Motive CardQuote-basedQuote-basedNot published
Verizon ConnectFuel managementQuote-basedQuote-basedNot published
AtoBFuel cardQuote-basedQuote-basedNot published
WEXFleet cardQuote-basedQuote-basedNot published

Fleetio states that actual pricing depends on plan, fleet size, contract term and payment term, so read its figures as list prices, not quotes. Samsara, Motive, Verizon Connect, AtoB and WEX publish no dollar figures for these products on the pages we opened, so a quote is the only price you can get from them. Third-party fee figures for card programs conflict across review sites, so we did not use any of them.

A 10-truck month, worked through

Take an illustrative fleet of 10 trucks that each buy 500 gallons a month, or 5,000 gallons in total. At $6.352 a gallon, the U.S. on-highway diesel price for the week of October 26, 2026, according to U.S. Energy Information Administration, that fuel spend is about $31,760 a month. A $30 per vehicle SafeFleet plan on Azuga, according to Azuga, adds $300 a month, about 0.9% of diesel spend. On the Fleetio side, fuel records are fuel_entries objects, and the developer guide ties a vendor reference to a vendor_id only when one is saved on the entry, according to Fleetio. Any fill-up without that link needs a person or a rule to match it before it reaches your IFTA totals. That matching step decides whether the software saves time, whichever product you pick.

A proposed US Tech Automations workflow for that matching step would start each day when a card file or a fuel_entries pull arrives. The action matches each row to a truck by vehicle ID and checks the odometer or GPS record for the same time. Rows with no match or no vendor link go to an exception queue. The output is one daily list showing the card, the time, the gallons and the reason for the exception. Prerequisites are a transaction export with time, gallons and card ID, a vehicle list keyed to the same IDs, and a reviewer who clears each exception before the record reaches the books.

Build it yourself or buy?

Many small operators try to stitch this together in Zapier, Make or n8n, or with a spreadsheet and a bookkeeping export. Those tools can run on a schedule, keep run histories, retry failed steps and branch on errors when you configure them. What you still own is the design: a re-sent card file must not double-post, someone must be escalated to when a match fails, access to card data must be restricted, and the flow must be maintained when a card provider changes its export format. A proposed US Tech Automations design would differ in three configurable ways: it would keep each run's inputs and exception list in one place, route mismatches to a named reviewer rather than an error log, and stop before any posting step until a person approves it. The prerequisites are API or export access to the card and telematics systems, a shared vehicle list, and a named reviewer, and the owner keeps approval of postings and the state filing.

When NOT to use US Tech Automations: skip a custom workflow if your fleet runs one card and one telematics system that already produces a state-by-state IFTA report, because the vendor's report is simpler to keep. Skip it if no one on your team will own the exception list, since a workflow with no reviewer only moves the problem somewhere else. Skip it if one person can reconcile the card statement by hand without difficulty each month, because the automation adds a system you must maintain for little gain.

Glossary for the buyer

  • Fuel-card feed: the transaction file or API stream from a card provider, listing card, driver, vehicle, gallons and location.

  • IFTA: the International Fuel Tax Agreement, under which carriers report fuel use by jurisdiction in quarterly returns.

  • Jurisdiction: a state or province where fuel is bought or miles are driven, which IFTA uses to split fuel tax.

  • Mileage by jurisdiction: the miles driven in each state, usually taken from GPS or odometer data.

  • Telematics: in-vehicle hardware and software that reports location, odometer and engine data.

  • Reconciliation: matching each fuel purchase to a truck and a mileage record, and flagging the ones that do not match.

  • Exception queue: the list of unmatched or suspicious transactions that a person must review before they are posted.

Common mistakes before you request a quote

  • Comparing seat prices without the card's fee schedule, which can move your real cost more than the software does.

  • Assuming "IFTA support" means the vendor files the return. Motive says it does not automate the filing.

  • Skipping the sample export. Ask for a file built from real fuel and mileage data, not a demo dataset.

  • Forgetting non-card purchases. Fuel bought in cash or on an unlinked card still needs a record.

  • Buying for the fleet you hope to run and paying minimums on trucks you do not have yet.

Questions buyers ask before they sign

Do I need this software if my trucks stay in one state?

Usually not, because IFTA reporting applies to trucks that operate across member jurisdictions, so a single-state operation generally does not file the quarterly return.

Does Motive file my IFTA return for me?

No. Motive's IFTA page says it automates the creation of IFTA reports, but not the filing itself.

Do I still file a return for a quarter with no fuel purchases?

Yes. Florida's IFTA page says "Tax returns must be filed for every quarter, even if no operations or purchase of fuel in an IFTA jurisdiction occurred," according to Florida DMV.

Which product has the lowest published price?

The Essential plan on Fleetio is the lowest per-vehicle figure we found, but its page does not say which tier includes fuel tracking, so compare the features as well as the price.

Should I get a written fee schedule from the card provider?

Yes. None of the card pages we opened lists a complete fee schedule, and fees for late payment or transactions change what you actually pay.

Pick the category, then ask for the export

Pick the category first, shortlist two products from it, and ask each vendor for a quote and a sample export built from your own fuel and mileage data. If your trucks have card transactions and a state-by-state IFTA need, the sample export will tell you more than any feature list. Teams that want the exception review and the quarter-end check designed around their own exports can see how US Tech Automations configures this.

About the Author

Garrett Mullins
Garrett Mullins
Workflow Specialist

Helping businesses leverage automation for operational efficiency.