Skip to content
AI & Automation

DoorLoop vs Stessa in 2027: Which Fits Your Portfolio

Oct 27, 2026

DoorLoop or Stessa: decide the category first

DoorLoop and Stessa cover different halves of a rental business, so the scope decision comes before any price comparison. DoorLoop is an operations platform for leasing, maintenance and rent collection, priced per unit. Stessa is owner-side accounting for rental income, expenses and tax reports, priced per plan. Stessa is also no longer an independent company: JLL's technology division sold it to Roofstock in March 2021, according to JLL (2021).

In this guide, property management software means a system that runs the operational side of a rental portfolio, and owner accounting software means a tool that records income, expenses and tax-ready reports for the owner.

TL;DR: choose DoorLoop if one system must run leasing and maintenance for your units, and choose Stessa if you mainly need clean owner books and tax reports for rentals whose day-to-day work happens elsewhere.

Key Takeaways

  • DoorLoop is priced per unit with monthly minimums, so its cost depends on how many doors it runs. Stessa is priced per plan, and every paid plan covers unlimited properties.

  • Stessa is owned by Roofstock, and its full-service option is delivered through Mynd, which Roofstock has also combined with.

  • At a 60-unit size, DoorLoop's cheapest plan costs more than its per-unit rate alone suggests because of the monthly floor. Stessa's cheapest paid plan does not run leasing or maintenance at all.

  • DoorLoop's One plan includes full API access, which makes a custom sync possible. This guide did not verify a public API for Stessa.

  • Reviewers report gaps in both products, including short-term rental handling for DoorLoop and no eSignatures on Stessa's free plan.

  • Check live pricing before you buy. Stessa's cash-yield figures conflict on its own page, and DoorLoop's yearly per-unit rates are not printed in the text read for this guide.

How we evaluated these two tools

This is an informed buyer's guide built from public information. It draws on each vendor's pricing page, a seller's press release, a law firm's merger note, an IRS form page and a third-party review page, and it does not rely on hands-on use of either product. The weights below reflect what a landlord or operations lead actually decides on. The percentages are a judgment, not a published vendor score. For a broader scan of automation platforms across the category, see the property management vendor automation comparison.

CriterionWeight
Pricing fit at your real unit count25%
Operations scope: leasing, maintenance, rent collection20%
Owner accounting and tax output20%
Integrations and API access15%
Ownership and product direction10%
Support and onboarding10%

Pricing and operations scope carry 45% together because they decide whether the two products are comparable at all. Owner accounting and tax output carry another 20%, since it is the one area where Stessa is built for the owner. The remaining 35% covers integrations, ownership risk and support, which tend to matter after the first year of use rather than in the first sales call.

Who owns each product now

Roofstock has owned Stessa since March 2021 according to JLL (2021). The release says Roofstock planned to integrate Stessa's software into its retail product offerings, and it does not say whether Stessa will stay standalone, so treat Stessa's product direction as Roofstock's to set.

Roofstock's combination with Mynd, announced May 16, 2024, has Mynd merging into Roofstock's corporate entity while Mynd's property management operations keep the Mynd name, according to Fenwick (2024). That matters because Stessa's pricing page offers a full-service property management option delivered through Mynd, and its footer shows logos for Roofstock, Mynd and RentPrep.

The pages reviewed for this guide show no ownership change for DoorLoop. Check its pricing page for agents marked "Coming Soon," namely the Rent Collection Agent and the Prospect Agent, before you rely on them.

Public pricing, side by side

Pricing checked October 26, 2026.

DoorLoop's One plan costs $2.50 per unit per month, with $1.50 per unit above 100 units. DoorLoop's Connect plan costs $4.00 per unit, and DoorLoop's Multiply plan costs $5.00 per unit. Each plan also carries a monthly minimum: $199 on One, $299 on Connect and $399 on Multiply. Monthly floor on DoorLoop's cheapest plan: $199 according to DoorLoop (2026). The page says yearly billing saves up to 25%, but the yearly per-unit rates do not appear in the text available for this guide, so the comparisons here use monthly rates.

Stessa's Essentials plan is free and covers one portfolio with unlimited properties, bank data feeds, basic reports and online rent collection. Stessa's Manage plan costs $12 per month billed annually or $15 billed monthly, and Stessa's Pro plan costs $28 per month billed annually or $35 billed monthly, with unlimited portfolios. Highest Stessa paid-plan price: $35 per month according to Stessa (2026).

The same Stessa page says annual billing saves 20%, lists state-specific lease templates at $15 each on Essentials, and describes Stessa as a financial technology company rather than an FDIC-insured bank, with banking provided by Thread Bank, according to Stessa (2026). Its cash-balance yield is also listed in two places with different figures, so do not rely on any yield number until you see it on the live page.

Feature matrix for the deciding features

DoorLoop's pricing page says the One plan includes full API access and that Multiply includes the Maintenance Ops Agent and Lease Renewal Agent, according to DoorLoop (2026). The matrix below uses only what the two pricing pages state. "Not listed" means the pages read for this guide do not mention the feature, which is not the same as proof that the product lacks it.

FeatureDoorLoopStessa
Pricing basisPer unit, with monthly minimumPer plan, unlimited properties
API accessFull API access on OneNot listed
Leasing and renewal automationLease Renewal Agent on MultiplyNot listed
Maintenance workflowMaintenance Ops Agent on MultiplyMaintenance tracking on Essentials
AI or receptionist featuresReceptionist Agent on Connect and Multiply; AI as an add-on on Connect and MultiplyNot listed
Owner tax reportsNot listedSchedule E report on Manage; CapEx tax package on Pro
Bank data feedsLive bank sync mentioned; plan mapping unclearAutomated bank data feeds on Essentials
Priority supportVIP priority support on ConnectPriority chat on Manage; priority phone on Pro
User seatsUnlimited on One; not stated for other plansNot stated

The sharpest split is operations. DoorLoop puts its leasing and maintenance agents on the upper tiers and sells its AI as an add-on, and the page prints no add-on price. Stessa's Essentials plan includes maintenance tracking and tenant screening, but nothing on its pricing page describes a leasing or renewal workflow. That makes Stessa an accounting tool first, not an operations tool.

A 60-unit book, priced out

The table multiplies the cited monthly rates across a 60-unit book. Stessa's paid prices do not change with unit count, because every paid plan covers unlimited properties.

VendorPlanRate basisMonthly cost, 60 unitsYearly at that rate
DoorLoopOne$2.50 per unit, $199 minimum$199$2,388
DoorLoopConnect$4.00 per unit, $299 minimum$299$3,588
DoorLoopMultiply$5.00 per unit, $399 minimum$399$4,788
StessaEssentialsFree$0$0
StessaManage$12 annual or $15 monthly$12 annual or $15 monthly$144 or $180
StessaPro$28 annual or $35 monthly$28 annual or $35 monthly$336 or $420
StessaFull-service via MyndQuote-basedQuote-basedQuote-based

Take an owner with 60 rental units who wants leasing, maintenance and owner reporting in one place. On DoorLoop's One plan, 60 units at $2.50 comes to $150 a month, which is below the $199 minimum, so the bill is $199, or $2,388 over twelve months. Connect would be 60 times $4.00, or $240, lifted to $299 ($3,588 a year), and Multiply would be 60 times $5.00, or $300, lifted to $399 ($4,788 a year). A proposed sync that keeps unit listing status current would call DoorLoop's PUT /units/{unitId} endpoint with the listing.activeListing field. That endpoint replaces the whole unit record, so the job must fetch, change and resend the complete object, or omitted fields are cleared, per DoorLoop's API reference.

Stessa's Pro plan at $28 per month on annual billing comes to $336 over twelve months, the Pro rate cited above multiplied out. The gap is not a saving, though. Stessa's paid tiers handle the owner's books and tax reports, while the DoorLoop figures pay for leasing, maintenance and rent collection. An owner who needs both jobs done in one place is comparing a bookkeeping subscription with an operations platform.

Where each product falls short

Stessa's free plan is useful but thin. It leaves out eSignatures and legal forms, its dashboards show key metrics only, and live phone support appears only on Pro. The paid Manage plan adds some of the missing pieces, including the Schedule E report, but nothing on its pricing page makes it an operations tool.

DoorLoop's gaps show up in user reviews rather than on its pricing page. A third-party review page that summarizes 107 user reviews lists "not ideal for short-term vacation rentals" as a drawback, and reviewers wanted invoices attached to owner statements and the ability for maintenance staff to assign work orders, according to B2B Reviews (2026). That page says it may earn money from partner links, and it still shows an older starter tier that does not match DoorLoop's current pricing page. Use it for reviewer themes, not for prices.

Who this is for

Who this is for: DoorLoop. An operator who runs leasing, maintenance and rent collection in one system, bills by unit, and needs a ledger connection that a developer can build on.

Red flags: the portfolio is mainly short-term rentals, owner statements must carry invoices now, or the maintenance team needs to assign its own work orders.

Who this is for: Stessa. An owner who holds rentals, wants bookkeeping and a tax package, and does not need leasing or maintenance run from the same tool. Schedule E is the IRS form for reporting rental real estate income and losses, according to IRS (2026), which is why the tax package matters for this buyer.

Red flags: you need eSignatures or legal forms on the free tier, you need live phone support below Pro, or you are counting on a cash-yield figure the page does not settle.

Where a custom automation layer fits

A proposed, configurable design, not a live deployment: US Tech Automations would set up a month-end workflow that starts on the first business day of each month, pulls the prior month's transaction records from DoorLoop through its API or an export if your plan exposes them, maps each line to a QuickBooks category, and writes a draft batch to QuickBooks. The output is a draft for the bookkeeper to review, not a posted entry. The prerequisites are API access on the DoorLoop plan you choose (the One plan includes it, as cited above), a QuickBooks connection, and a named owner for the category mapping table. Human review sits at the mapping table and before anything posts.

A second proposed workflow targets maintenance spend. The trigger is a DoorLoop work order marked complete. The action creates a draft bill in QuickBooks with the vendor and amount, and the output is an owner-approval queue, so no payable bill exists until a person approves it. The prerequisites are that work-order records are readable through the API on your plan, which this guide did not verify endpoint by endpoint, and an amount threshold that you set for when an owner must approve. The design would keep a run log so each draft can be traced back to its source record.

For an owner who uses only Stessa, the same pattern starts from an export, because this guide did not verify a public Stessa API. US Tech Automations would configure a review step where a person confirms each imported line before it reaches the ledger. That review step, not the automation, is what keeps owner statements accurate.

When NOT to use US Tech Automations: skip a custom layer if a bookkeeper can enter the month's transactions by hand without strain, if your books already reconcile through Stessa's bank feeds with no ledger to write to, or if your processes change so often that nobody will own the workflow after it is built. A simpler tool wins in each of those cases.

Zapier, Make, or n8n instead

A DIY build in Zapier, Make or n8n can do much of the same work at a lower starting cost. Those tools can keep run histories, retries, error branches and audit evidence when you configure them. The buyer still designs and owns the parts that fail in production: observability (knowing a run broke), idempotency (so a retry does not post the same bill twice), escalation to a named person, access controls on the API keys, and maintenance when DoorLoop or QuickBooks changes a field. Choose a DIY build if you have an in-house developer or a bookkeeper willing to own the flow. Choose an outside team's configured design if you want the build and the upkeep handled for you, with the owner still signing off on each step.

Common mistakes and a decision checklist

Common mistakes:

  • Comparing Stessa's plan price with DoorLoop's per-unit price as if both buy the same work.

  • Forgetting DoorLoop's monthly minimum when the unit count is small.

  • Treating DoorLoop AI as included. It is an add-on on Connect and Multiply, and the page prints no add-on price.

  • Quoting Stessa's cash yield from memory. Its figures conflict across its own page, so check the live page.

  • Buying before confirming whether short-term rentals are in scope.

Decision checklist:

  • Do you need leasing, maintenance and rent collection in one system? If yes, start with DoorLoop. If no, start with Stessa.

  • Count the units you expect to bill next year, not only the units you have today.

  • Confirm the plan you need includes the API access your sync depends on, and check the endpoint in the API reference.

  • Ask which owner reports and tax packages your plan includes.

  • Confirm whether short-term rentals are in scope before you commit.

Frequently asked questions

Is Stessa still a separate company?

No. Roofstock owns Stessa, and the ownership section above covers the purchase and the Mynd merger.

Which one costs less for a 60-unit portfolio?

Stessa's paid plans cost less on paper, but they do not run leasing or maintenance, so the difference is not a like-for-like saving.

Does DoorLoop include API access?

Yes. The One plan includes full API access, as cited in the feature matrix section, but confirm that the specific endpoint you need appears in DoorLoop's API reference before you plan around it.

Can Stessa run leasing and maintenance for me?

Stessa's full-service option runs through Mynd, but its pricing page shows no price for it, so you need a quote before you compare costs.

Does US Tech Automations replace DoorLoop or Stessa?

No. In the proposed design it sits beside DoorLoop and QuickBooks, reads and writes records through their interfaces, and leaves approvals with a person.

Which should a small owner choose?

Stessa fits an owner who mainly needs clean books and tax reports, and DoorLoop fits an operator who runs the leasing and maintenance work itself.

Making the call this quarter

Start with scope. If the work is leasing, maintenance and rent collection across your units, DoorLoop is the category that fits, and its per-unit pricing with monthly minimums is the number to model against your real count. If the work is owner bookkeeping and Schedule E reporting for rentals that someone else runs day to day, Stessa is the simpler fit, and its free tier covers a single portfolio.

Before you sign either one, confirm the live prices, the plan that includes the API you need, and whether a custom workflow belongs in your budget. If you want to see how US Tech Automations configures this for a specific ledger and review path, the team can walk through the design on its site.

About the Author

Garrett Mullins
Garrett Mullins
Workflow Specialist

Helping businesses leverage automation for operational efficiency.