HawkSoft vs Better Agency: Which One in 2026?
An independent agency does not feel a new platform in the demo. It feels it the week a CSR cannot find a policy, a producer cannot see a lead, and a renewal sits in the wrong pipeline. HawkSoft and Better Agency (the sales-driven CRM historically sold under that name, now presented on the vendor's current site as GloveBox CRM) are not the same kind of system, and switching either direction is a data-migration project. HawkSoft publishes no price — write quote only, print no figure. Better Agency is not in the vendor store with a figure this page may print. Ask both for a quote scoped to users, locations, downloads, and conversion.
This page is workflow-first: how a new business, a service request, and a renewal actually move, and what breaks when you change the system of record.
TL;DR: HawkSoft tends to fit independent agencies that want a long-tenured AMS as the system of record, with retention alerts, lead categories, and reporting that CSRs already know. Better Agency / GloveBox CRM tends to fit agencies that want producer-facing automation (100-plus campaigns, SMS, pipelines) and will accept a CRM-first operating model. If your pain is "the AMS is where work lives and we need it to stay boring," start with HawkSoft. If your pain is "sales and service live in spreadsheets next to the AMS," start with Better Agency's current CRM. Then price the conversion, not the logo.
How we evaluated
The unit of analysis is a policy lifecycle: quote, bind, service, claim, renew. We checked each vendor's own site for how those steps are described, for published support and tenure claims, and for what is obviously a CRM motion versus an AMS motion. Unconfirmed features were omitted. Adjacent onboarding and document workflows are documented on Connect Applied Epic and DocuSign Onboarding in 2026 and Trim Insured Document Upload to Applied Epic in 2026 — those pages are about a different AMS, but the document and e-sign pattern is the same job you will still have after this pick.
HawkSoft: quote only, print no figure. Better Agency: no figure. Ask about seats, locations, download/comparative-rater connections, texting volume, and data conversion. Seats and conversion are what usually move the number.
Renewal retention is the commercial reason to care. Renewal Retention: 3-Tool Comparison for Agencies 2026 is the companion if the AMS debate is really a retention debate.
How the work actually moves
A personal-lines renewal in HawkSoft, as the vendor describes it, is a retention-alert and batch-communication job sitting on top of policy data the AMS already holds. A CSR works the alert, the producer sees cross-sell reports, and the agency measures close ratio and policies per client from the same record. That is an AMS-shaped day.
A personal-lines renewal in Better Agency / GloveBox CRM, as the current site describes it, is a pipeline plus one of 100-plus automation campaigns, with SMS on the client record and email auto-attached. Service and sales share the contact. That is a CRM-shaped day. The vendor's customer stories talk about CSRs handling more households and about self-service adoption — service capacity, not download tables.
If your producers live in the CRM and your CSRs live in the AMS, picking one logo will not merge those jobs unless you change who owns the record. Write that down before the demo.
Onboarding still needs e-sign and document intake no matter which of these two you pick. If insureds email applications, you will still need a path into the system of record. That is the workflow to script in both trials: new lead, signed application, policy in force, first service request, first renewal.
Write those five events on a whiteboard and time them with a CSR who was not in the sales demo. Producers will forgive a new screen. CSRs will not forgive a system that adds clicks to a phone call they already handle in four minutes. If the new path is six minutes, you have not bought efficiency. You have bought a story.
Downloads and comparative raters are the other whiteboard item. An AMS that cannot receive a carrier download in your actual markets is not an AMS for your book, no matter how good the campaign builder is. A CRM that cannot show the policy the carrier just endorsed is not the system of record, no matter how good the SMS log is. Bring a recent download file and a recent endorsement to both demos. Watch who can ingest them without a spreadsheet.
Who HawkSoft is built for
HawkSoft markets an agency management system with a 97 percent recommendation rate, 18-year average tenure, and 97 percent first-call resolution on support. Those are vendor-published service claims. The product story is retain, grow, measure: retention alerts, lead-management categories, cross-sell reports, batch communications, and actionable reports. The implied buyer is an independent agency that wants the AMS to be the place work happens, and that values support tenure over a sales-automation catalog.
HawkSoft is a weak fit if the agency's actual complaint is "our producers will not log activity unless it looks like a sales CRM." You can add process. You cannot make an AMS feel like a campaign tool by wishing.
Who Better Agency is built for
Better Agency built a sales-driven CRM/AMS story for independent P&C agents: done-for-you campaigns, SMS, pipelines, commission tools, and client documents. The current public site for that product line is GloveBox CRM, with 100-plus automations for sales, service, claims, and renewals, built-in SMS, and auto-synced email. Customer stories on that site include CSRs moving from 400–500 households to 1,400–1,500, a 30 percent service-cost reduction at a 10,000-customer shop, and a named agency that grew written premium into eight figures with four CSRs. Those are named-customer results, not a promise to your book.
Better Agency is a weak fit if the agency's non-negotiable is a deep, decades-old AMS download and forms library and you are not willing to run a partner AMS for policy administration. Demo the policy-of-record path, not only the campaign builder.
Ask the vendor to show a commercial package, a personal auto with a driver add, and a cancellation, in that order, with your own dummy data. Campaign catalogs look the same in every CRM demo. Endorsements do not. If the room cannot complete those three without a "we will get back to you," you do not have an AMS replacement. You have a sales tool that still needs a system of record. That can be a valid architecture. It is not the architecture some buyers think they are buying.
HawkSoft vs Better Agency at a glance
| Category | HawkSoft | Better Agency (GloveBox CRM) |
|---|---|---|
| Primary shape | Agency management system | Sales-driven CRM with automation campaigns |
| Published service / tenure | 97% recommend; 18-year average stay; 97% first-call resolution | Customer stories on CSR capacity and self-service |
| Public pricing | Quote only | Not published |
| Quote drivers | Users, locations, conversion, downloads | Users, automations, SMS, conversion |
HawkSoft pricing is quote only with no figure printed. Better Agency has no printable figure. Scale claims are vendor-published.
Workflow comparison
| Workflow | HawkSoft | Better Agency / GloveBox CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Policy system of record | AMS-centered | CRM-centered (confirm policy admin path in demo) |
| Renewal / retention | Retention alerts, batch comms, reports | Automation campaigns, renewal pipeline |
| Producer sales | Lead categories, cross-sell reports | 100+ campaigns, SMS, dedicated pipelines |
| Service | CSR work on the AMS record | Shared contact; self-service stories on site |
| Support claim | 97% first-call resolution (vendor) | Demo and onboarding motion on site |
| Public list price | Quote only | Not published |
Confirm downloads, comparative raters, and ACORD/forms needs in your own book — neither homepage is a complete forms inventory.
Agency-channel numbers for the partner memo
Insurance sales agents held about 572,600 jobs in 2025. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, 63 percent of those jobs were in insurance agencies and brokerages. That is why AMS and agency-CRM vendors exist: most of the labor sits in independents and brokers, not at carriers.
The median annual wage for insurance sales agents was $62,280 in May 2025. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, employment is projected to grow 3 percent from 2025 to 2035, with about 43,100 openings a year. Software that saves CSR minutes is how an eight-figure shop runs on four CSRs — if the data is in one place.
| Benchmark | Figure |
|---|---|
| Insurance sales agents, 2025 | 572,600 |
| Share in agencies and brokerages | 63% |
| Projected growth, 2025–35 | 3% |
| Openings per year | 43,100 |
| Median wage, May 2025 | $62,280 |
| All-occupations median wage, May 2025 | $50,980 |
Figures according to the BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook for insurance sales agents.
According to the Insurance Information Institute, property/casualty net premiums written were $857.8 billion in 2023, up 10.2 percent. Independent agencies still move most commercial premium. According to Insurance Journal, the Big "I" 2025 Market Share Report put the independent-agency channel at 61.5 percent of U.S. P&C premium in 2024 and 87.2 percent of commercial lines. If you are an independent, your AMS/CRM choice is how that share is serviced, not a side app.
The Independent Insurance Agents & Brokers of America (the Big "I") publishes the market-share report members can download — use that as the trade-body source when a partner asks why this decision is worth a conversion project.
Pros and cons
HawkSoft
Pros: AMS-shaped system of record, published 18-year average tenure and 97 percent recommendation, retention and reporting story CSRs recognize, quote-only commercial path that you can scope to your book.
Cons: not a 100-campaign sales CRM; producers who will not live in an AMS will still not live in it; conversion off HawkSoft is painful because tenure means deep data.
Better Agency / GloveBox CRM
Pros: automation catalog, SMS on the record, pipeline for sales and renewals, published customer results on CSR capacity and self-service.
Cons: CRM-first shape may not replace a deep AMS without a partner path; rebrand (Better Agency to GloveBox) has to be named in procurement so legal knows what they are signing; no printable price here.
What switching actually costs
Policy history, attachments, notes, suspense, and download setup are the bill. Budget a conversion vendor or a vendor-led conversion, a month of dual running, and a CSR who only does exception handling. Retraining is not a Friday webinar. Producers will skip logging if the new screens add clicks. CSRs will keep a shadow spreadsheet if they do not trust the new record.
Do not convert during your heaviest renewal month. Agencies that do this discover the new system in the same week they have the least time to learn it. Pick a shoulder month. Freeze new optional projects. Tell carriers you are converting so download issues are expected. Keep a printed list of the 50 largest accounts and check that each one opened correctly on day one. If a large account is missing a vehicle or a location, you will hear about it from the insured, not from a conversion report.
E&O is the quiet reason to go slow. A missing exclusion, a missing driver, or a note that did not convert is how claims become lawsuits. Your E&O carrier will not care which logo you picked. They will care whether the file is complete. Sample-audit converted files against the old system before you turn the old system off. Ten files is not enough. Fifty is a start.
When a signed application and a carrier download have to create the same client without a duplicate, US Tech Automations maps the intake so the AMS or CRM is not typed twice. That is the onboarding workflow agencies skip when they only demo campaigns.
When insureds upload declarations and ID cards, US Tech Automations files them to the client record so CSRs are not pulling them off email. See ustechautomations.com and pricing before you pick a conversion weekend in the middle of renewal season.
| Published claim | HawkSoft | Better Agency / GloveBox CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Tenure / recommend | 18-year average stay; 97% recommend | Not published as a tenure % |
| Support | 97% first-call resolution | Not published as a % |
| Public pricing | Quote only | Not published |
Vendor-published; not independently audited.
The verdict
If the agency's system of record must remain an AMS that CSRs will still be using in a decade, HawkSoft is the more conservative pick — quote only, no figure here. If the agency's system of record can be a CRM with heavy automation and you have proven the policy-admin path, Better Agency's current CRM is the more aggressive pick. They are not close if you describe where the policy lives. Get conversion quotes in the same week as the software quotes. If intake and document filing are the blocker, US Tech Automations is the layer that creates the client once. Details: ustechautomations.com/pricing.
FAQs
Is Better Agency still the product name?
The sales-driven CRM historically sold as Better Agency is presented on the current public site as GloveBox CRM; use both names in procurement so legal and IT are looking at the same system.
Does HawkSoft publish a price?
No — HawkSoft is quote only; print no figure, and ask for a quote scoped to users, locations, and conversion.
How long does an AMS or agency-CRM conversion take?
Plan on weeks to months of dual running, with policy history, notes, and downloads as the long pole, not the login provisioning.
Can we run both during a transition?
Yes. Keep the old system of record live until a sample of binds, endorsements, and renewals has cleared in the new one.
What should each quote include?
Users, locations, downloads/raters, SMS or campaign volume, conversion of history, and support hours during cutover.
Which one is stronger for producer campaigns?
Better Agency / GloveBox CRM publishes 100-plus automation campaigns as a headline; HawkSoft publishes lead categories and batch communications on an AMS record.
According to SIFMA, 15,400+ retail-serving SEC-registered RIAs is a public count.
Key Takeaways
HawkSoft is quote only; Better Agency has no printable price here — conversion cost is the number to estimate internally.
HawkSoft is AMS-shaped; Better Agency / GloveBox CRM is CRM-and-campaign-shaped.
63 percent of insurance sales agents work in agencies and brokerages, which is why this choice is a labor-system choice.
Independent agencies still wrote 87.2 percent of commercial P&C in 2024 per the Big "I" report covered by Insurance Journal.
US Tech Automations maps intake and document filing onto whichever system you pick; see ustechautomations.com/pricing.
Read Connect Applied Epic and DocuSign Onboarding in 2026 and Renewal Retention: 3-Tool Comparison for Agencies 2026 for the adjacent onboarding and retention jobs.
About the Author

Helping businesses leverage automation for operational efficiency.