TenantTurner vs ShowMojo 2026: Pricing and Self-Showing

TenantTurner vs ShowMojo in 2026: same parent, two products

Neither product has been renamed or discontinued, but the two are no longer independent rivals. Both platforms are owned by PropertyTek and were consolidated under it in 2024, according to REI Ink (August 2026 profile). Each still has its own website, its own pricing page and its own product positioning, so you still pick one of them when you buy.

Leasing automation software captures rental inquiries, qualifies prospects, books or unlocks showings, and follows up so staff do not handle each step by hand. Both tools do this. The difference is where each one is strongest.

TL;DR: Tenant Turner is the simpler tool and has the lower published starting price. ShowMojo is the more configurable tool and is positioned for larger, more complicated portfolios. REI Ink describes Tenant Turner as the one that "leans toward simplicity" and ShowMojo as the one that leans toward customizability, which matches the structure of each vendor's pricing page. If you run a small or mid-sized portfolio with one leasing workflow, start with Tenant Turner. If you have layered teams, in-house agents mixed with third-party agents, or complicated showing routing, start with ShowMojo.

This guide separates facts taken from vendor pages and independent sources from our own analysis. It is a buyer's guide built from public information, not a lab test. Ratings from review sites such as Capterra are not printed here, because those pages could not be opened during research and nothing on this page is quoted from memory.

Key Takeaways

• Tenant Turner and ShowMojo share a parent, PropertyTek, but they are still two products with separate plans, so you have a real choice to make.

• On published starting rates, Tenant Turner is lower on both unit-based and listing-based plans, but the pricing pages do not state whether the per-unit rate is monthly, so confirm that before comparing totals.

• For self-showing, Tenant Turner publishes a clear verification chain (prescreening, ID and phone checks, then a time-limited code), while ShowMojo publishes more hardware options and a separate fee for third-party devices.

• For showing scheduling, ShowMojo is described as handling drive times and clustering, while Tenant Turner is described as simpler to set up.

• Prices for the AI Virtual Agent add-on are quote-based at both vendors, so budget for a sales conversation before you count on AI lead response.

• Whichever you pick, the tool books and unlocks showings but does not by itself reconcile showings with your property management system (PMS), CRM and owner reporting. That step is where an orchestration layer or your own automation work matters.

Who this is for

This comparison is for a property manager or landlord running roughly 20 to 2,000 rental units who has narrowed the shortlist to these two. It assumes you already know you want prospects to book showings without phone tag, and you want to know which tool fits your portfolio and budget.

Choose Tenant Turner if you want fast setup, a single leasing flow and the lower published starting rate. Choose ShowMojo if your portfolio has layered organization structures, a mix of in-house and third-party showing agents, or routing rules that a simple calendar cannot express.

Red flags: you need a committed price for more than 1,000 units or 50 listings (both vendors send you to a quote); you plan to depend on an AI agent whose price is not published; you have no one who can own configuration after launch; you cannot confirm that your PMS and your lock hardware are supported before you sign.

How we evaluated these tools

We weighted six criteria by how much each one changes a leasing manager's week. The weights are our analysis, not a vendor claim. We scored using only public pages: vendor pricing and product pages, a trade-press profile, a competitor's comparison (flagged as such) and a press release. We did not run either product.

For a deeper look at the category, see our guide to best showing scheduling software for real estate in 2026, which covers tools beyond these two.

Feature matrix: what each tool publishes

This matrix is normalized: every row asks the same question of both vendors, and a cell says "not published" when the pages I opened did not say.

US Tech Automations does not appear in this matrix because it is not a showing tool. In a proposed configuration it sits above whichever tool you choose and handles the hand-offs described later in this guide.

Self-showing and showing scheduling, head to head

Self-showing

Tenant Turner publishes the most complete access workflow. A time-limited Seros code is issued automatically when a showing is scheduled, prospects must clear prescreening plus ID and phone verification first, and codes expire at the end of the approved window, with remote revocation possible, according to Tenant Turner (2026). The hardware is its own: a keypad lockbox called SerosBox costs $59 as a one-time purchase, and SerosLock, a smart lock that replaces the deadbolt, costs $79. The Seros page lists no supported third-party locks, so ask which other lock brands work before you assume your existing hardware is covered.

ShowMojo sells MojoBox lockboxes and MojoLock smart locks, and its pricing page charges different monthly fees for its own devices and for third-party ones, which signals that it supports hardware from other brands. It also lists self-showing access assistance as part of the Ultra plan. The pricing page does not describe the verification steps, so ask for the exact prospect checks (ID, phone, screening) during a demo.

Analysis: if your biggest worry is who gets into an empty unit, Tenant Turner's documented chain is easier to evaluate from public material. If your portfolio already has a mix of lock brands, ShowMojo's published third-party device fee is a more explicit signal that mixed hardware is a normal case.

Scheduling

Both vendors list automated tour scheduling in the Pro plan. The difference is in how much logic sits behind the calendar. ShowMojo's autonomous scheduling clusters showings and accounts for drive times. The same profile says it handles large multifamily properties with layered organizational structures and mixed in-house and third-party agents. That is the clearest published signal about which tool fits a complicated team.

Tenant Turner is positioned the other way. The same profile credits it with being the simpler, easier-to-use option, and says Tenant Turner reports 75% fewer no-shows. That is a company-reported figure with no stated baseline, so treat it as marketing, not a benchmark.

If scheduling is the part of your workflow you want to compare against other categories of tools, read our guide to real estate calendar tools for showing scheduling, which explains where a calendar tool ends and a showing platform begins.

Lead response and AI

Both vendors offer the same two lead-response layers. The Ultra plan adds a live answering service with call center agents, and the AI Virtual Agent is a priced add-on. REI Ink reports that the Virtual Agent answers prospect questions by email, text or voicemail around the clock, and that it has completed 111,000 AI conversations since its May launch (company-reported, not independently verified).

A competitor's view is useful here only as a warning label. Showdigs, which sells a competing product, says in a May 2026 post, according to Showdigs (2026), that both tools rely on scripted automation plus call center support rather than true AI for off-script inquiries. We cannot verify that claim, and it comes from a vendor with a stake in the answer, so use it as a question to ask in a demo, not as a finding.

Pricing and total cost

Pricing checked October 8, 2026. Both vendors publish starting rates, and both send larger portfolios to a quote. The pricing pages do not state whether the per-unit figure is per month, so confirm the billing period with the vendor before comparing annual totals.

Tenant Turner unit-based starting rate: $1.17 per unit according to Tenant Turner (2026). ShowMojo unit-based starting rate: $1.30 per unit according to ShowMojo (2026).

Both pricing pages show a yearly and monthly toggle but publish only the yearly figures. Tenant Turner's page also says each plan includes a fixed number of listing slots and that the monthly price does not change with tenant turnover, though the slot counts are not published. Across all four rows, Tenant Turner's published starting rates are lower than ShowMojo's, by roughly 10% to 12% on the unit-based plans and by 15% to 11% on the listing-based Pro and Ultra plans respectively.

Hardware is a separate line item. The figures below are the one-time device prices and monthly fees printed on each vendor's pages.

Tenant Turner's Seros page says installment options need an order of 10 or more devices and bulk pricing starts at 50 or more devices. Its monthly fees fall as the term lengthens, so read the term before you compare. Price items that neither vendor publishes:

Worked example (illustrative, not a customer result): a manager with 300 units, 24 turnovers a year and $1,800 monthly rent loses about $60 a day per vacant unit ($1,800 divided by 30). If faster booking and self-showing take 3 days off each turnover, the yearly saving is 24 × 3 × $60 = $4,320. At the published starting rates, 300 units cost $351 per billing period at Tenant Turner's $1.17 rate (300 × $1.17) and $390 at ShowMojo's $1.30 rate (300 × $1.30). If the period is a month, that is $4,212 and $4,680 a year, so a 3-day gain barely covers Tenant Turner and falls short of ShowMojo, while a 5-day gain (24 × 5 × $60 = $7,200) clears both. To measure the real gain instead of guessing, record each lead outcome in a CRM property such as hs_lead_status, which HubSpot lists among its default contact properties, according to HubSpot (2026), and compare days-to-lease before and after.

Why vacancy days are worth modeling: Single-family rental vacancy, Q1 2025: 6.3% according to Rentometer (2025), the highest since Q1 2016. Local markets vary, and in Houston the typical single-family rental sat on the market for 48 days in December 2025 according to Houston Agent Magazine (2026), up one week from a year earlier. Those are market context figures, not results of either tool.

Vendor profiles

Tenant Turner

Best fit: small and mid-sized portfolios, single-family and mixed rentals, and teams that want a short path from inquiry to unlocked door. Combined customer base: roughly 4,500 customers across both platforms according to REI Ink (2026, company-reported), so Tenant Turner is not a niche tool, though the split by platform is not published.

Limitations: the pricing page lists no tenant screening in Pro, the AI Virtual Agent is quote-based, and the Seros page lists no third-party locks. REI Ink's framing of Tenant Turner as the simpler option also implies fewer configuration paths for a complicated team.

Implementation: you connect your PMS, set showing availability, write the prequalification questions and choose lock hardware. Tenant Turner announced a revamped API in July 2026, available to all customers at no cost and documented with setup guides, endpoint references and authentication details, according to the Tenant Turner press release via GlobeNewswire (July 2026). Primary evidence: the plans page and Seros page cited above.

ShowMojo

Best fit: larger multifamily portfolios, teams with layered structures, and operations that mix in-house and third-party agents. Its scheduling logic and 50-partner syndication reach, as reported by REI Ink, are aimed at that complexity.

Limitations: higher published starting rates than Tenant Turner on every plan, a separate $5.00 monthly fee on each third-party device, and more settings to learn. Its API and webhook documentation could not be retrieved during research, so ask for it before you plan any integration work.

Implementation: expect more setup time because of the flexibility. Decide agent assignment rules, showing windows and which listings allow self-showing before launch. Primary evidence: the ShowMojo pricing page for plans, hardware and fees.

Where both tools stop: the hand-offs between systems

Neither product is your system of record. The showing happens in the leasing tool, but the unit status lives in the PMS, the lead lives in a CRM, and the owner expects a report. The gaps are where manual work comes back: a showing booked for a unit that was just leased, a no-show that never gets a follow-up text, or an owner report assembled by hand on Fridays.

A proposed workflow from US Tech Automations would be configured above the leasing tool, not instead of it. The trigger would be a showing-created or showing-updated event (a webhook if the vendor offers one, or a scheduled export if not). The action would be to match the showing to the unit record in the PMS, check whether the unit still shows as available, and write the lead and showing time to the CRM. The output would be a corrected record plus an exceptions list for the leasing manager. Prerequisites are API or export access on the leasing tool, PMS read access, and a named person who owns the exception queue.

A second proposed workflow would handle no-shows and owner reporting. The trigger would be a showing whose end time has passed with no check-in or lockbox entry recorded. The action would be a templated follow-up text sent through your messaging provider, and a tag on the lead so the next showing request is routed to a person. The output would be a weekly owner summary drafted from showing counts and outcomes. Human review points are built in: a leasing manager approves any rule that cancels a showing or changes an access window, and a person signs off the first several owner summaries before they are sent automatically. Access codes stay inside the leasing tool and are never issued by the orchestration layer.

For the maintenance side of turnover, where vacant units wait on repairs before the first showing, see our guide to maintenance scheduling software for property management, and for the wider set of scheduling tools managers combine, see scheduling software for property managers.

Building it yourself in Zapier, Make or n8n

Many managers will price the alternative of wiring this together themselves in Zapier, Make or n8n, or building it in-house. That is a fair option. These tools can keep run histories, retry failed steps, branch on errors and give you audit evidence when configured well.

What you take on is the design and the upkeep. You must design observability so someone sees a failed run, idempotency so a retried webhook does not book or text twice, escalation when a step fails after retries, access controls for who can edit a workflow, and maintenance when a vendor changes a field. A proposed US Tech Automations design would configure those same pieces as part of a scoped build: a run log reviewed weekly, duplicate-event checks keyed on the showing identifier, a defined escalation to a named person, role-based access, and a change review when the leasing tool or PMS updates. The prerequisites are API or export access, a sandbox or test unit, and an owner on your side. If you have in-house technical staff and a small set of simple rules, the DIY route is often cheaper.

When NOT to use US Tech Automations: if you have a small portfolio and one leasing agent, the built-in scheduling in Tenant Turner or ShowMojo is enough. If your PMS already offers showing scheduling you are happy with, adding a layer creates more to maintain. And if neither your leasing tool nor your PMS gives you API or export access, there is nothing for an orchestration layer to connect to, so a simpler existing tool wins.

Decision checklist

Use this list before you sign with either vendor:

1. Count your units and listings, then ask both vendors for the quote tier that matches, since the published tiers stop at 1,000+ units and 50+ listings.

2. Confirm whether the per-unit rate is monthly, and ask for the price of the AI Virtual Agent in writing.

3. Ask which lock brands each vendor supports and what each device costs per month, including third-party devices.

4. Ask for the prospect verification steps for self-showing: ID, phone and any screening.

5. Confirm your PMS is on the integration list and whether data syncs one way or both ways.

6. Ask for API or webhook documentation, and who on your side will own the integration.

7. Ask for a reference customer with a portfolio like yours, and talk to them yourself.

Common mistakes

• Comparing starting rates as if they were your price. The published figures are the lowest tier, and larger portfolios move to a quote.

• Ignoring hardware. Device fees can exceed plan fees on a portfolio with many vacant listings at once.

• Treating vendor outcome claims as benchmarks. The 75% no-show figure and the 111,000 AI conversations are company-reported and carry no baseline.

• Buying AI lead response before knowing its price. Both vendors list it as a quote-based add-on.

• Expecting the tool to fix your data. If unit status in your PMS is wrong, the scheduler will book showings on the wrong units.

Glossary

• Self-showing: a prospect enters a vacant unit on their own using a time-limited access code.

• Lockbox: a keypad box that holds the key, used where the lock is not replaced.

• Smart lock: a keypad lock that replaces the deadbolt and issues temporary codes.

• Prequalification: questions a prospect answers before booking a showing.

• Listing slot: a unit of capacity in a listing-based plan, with the number per plan unpublished at Tenant Turner.

• Idempotency: an automation property that prevents the same event from being processed twice.

Questions buyers ask

Are TenantTurner and ShowMojo the same company?

No, they are separate products with a shared owner. Both were consolidated under PropertyTek in 2024, and each keeps its own site, pricing page and positioning.

Which is cheaper, TenantTurner or ShowMojo?

On the published starting rates, Tenant Turner is cheaper. Its Pro plan starts at $1.17 per unit against $1.30, and its listing-based Pro plan at $42.50 against $50.00, but large portfolios and add-ons are quote-based at both, so compare real quotes.

Which has better self-showing?

It depends on your hardware and risk tolerance. Tenant Turner publishes a clearer verification chain and its own lock line, while ShowMojo publishes more device options and a third-party device fee.

Do they offer AI lead response?

Yes, both list an AI Virtual Agent add-on, but neither publishes its price. Ask for a written quote and a demo of off-script questions before you rely on it.

Can I connect either one to my own systems?

Tenant Turner announced a revamped, no-cost API in July 2026 for all customers. For ShowMojo, API and webhook documentation could not be retrieved during research, so ask the vendor directly.

Should I build this in Zapier, Make or n8n instead?

Only if you have someone to own it. Those tools can support run histories, retries and error branches, but you must design the monitoring, duplicate protection and escalation yourself.

The decision in one paragraph

Pick Tenant Turner when you want the simpler tool, the lower published starting rate and a documented verification chain for self-showing. Pick ShowMojo when your team structure, agent mix or routing rules need the extra configuration, and you accept the higher starting rate. Either way, get a written quote that includes devices and the AI add-on, and plan for the hand-offs to your PMS and CRM, because those are what the leasing tool leaves undone. To see how a proposed orchestration layer sits on top of either product, see how US Tech Automations configures this.